PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40–60% and 0–8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5–80% and 50–75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75–89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91–100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.1371/journal.pone.0246536
?:doi
?:journal
  • PLoS_One
?:license
  • cc-by
?:pmc_json_files
  • document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7870088.xml.json
?:pmcid
?:pmid
?:pmid
  • 33556086.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:source
  • Medline; PMC
?:title
  • Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests
?:type
?:year
  • 2021-02-08

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all