| Property | Value |
|---|
|
?:abstract
|
-
From the Summary: [1] China has sought to demonstrate that its authoritarian political system has been more efficient at dealing with the coronavirus crisis than Western liberal democratic systems But the evidence shows that the political system in place did not necessarily correlate with how fast a state responded to the virus [2] Two factors have played a key role in speedy response: previous experience of the SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome] epidemic, and awareness of the lethality of the virus [3] How badly a state was affected had mostly to do with demographic aspects (age structure) and predispositional factors (the health status of its population) [4] In part, slow response time may be ascribed to a skewed threat perception resulting from geographical distance and a poor understanding of the exponential rate at which the virus was spreading COVID-19 (Disease);World health;International relations;Globalization--Health aspects
|
|
is
?:annotates
of
|
|
|
?:creator
|
|
|
?:license
|
|
|
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
|
|
|
?:source
|
|
|
?:title
|
-
Who\'s First Wins? International Crisis Response to Covid-19
|
|
?:type
|
|
|
?:who_covidence_id
|
|
|
?:year
|
|
![[This page as RDF]](https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}