PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • One standard menu of approaches to the prevalence of anti-microbial resistance diseases is to enhance surveillance, fund research to develop new antimicrobials, and educate providers and patients to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use. The primarily utilitarian reasoning behind this menu is unstable, however, if it fails to take fairness into account. This chapter develops an account of the fair uses of information gained in public health surveillance. We begin by sketching information needs and gaps in surveillance. We then demonstrate how analysis of information uses is incomplete if viewed from the perspectives of likely vectors of disease who may be subjects of fear and stigma and likely victims who may be coerced into isolation or quarantine. Next, we consider aspects of fairness in the use of information in non-ideal circumstances: inclusive participation in decisions about information use, resource plans for those needing services, and assurances of reciprocal support. Fairness in information use recognizes the ineluctable twinning of victims and vectors in the face of serious pandemic disease.
is ?:annotates of
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.1007/978-3-030-27874-8_15
?:doi
?:externalLink
?:journal
  • Ethics_and_Drug_Resistance:_Collective_Responsibility_for_Global_Public_Health
?:license
  • cc-by
?:pdf_json_files
  • document_parses/pdf_json/9d11f1aca34490ba20ae3eb96ed3068ed21370f3.json
?:pmc_json_files
  • document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7586433.xml.json
?:pmcid
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:sha_id
?:source
  • PMC
?:title
  • Fairness in the Use of Information About Carriers of Resistant Infections
?:type
?:year
  • 2020-04-06

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all