rbjfzsm7

Property	Value
?:abstract	Background: The twenty-first century viral respiratory epidemics have taught us valuable lessons. Our systematic review examined the impact of these epidemics, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), on mental health among different population groups, drawing on their insights for recommendations for the current COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane on April 4, 2020. Studies that had undefined mental health outcomes or did not use a validated scale for measure were excluded. Quality assessment was carried out via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: We included 95 studies, most of which were conducted in Hong Kong (31.6%) and China (21.4%). A total of 30 (30.9%) studies are on the general public, 41 (42.2%) on healthcare workers, and 26 (26.6%) on patients and quarantined individuals. Furthermore, 36 (37.1%) of the studies are of high quality, 48 (49.5%) are of moderate quality, and 13 (13.4%) are of low quality. The most significant mental health outcomes reported include anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. The subgroups identified to have a higher risk of psychiatric symptoms among the general public include females, the elderly, individuals with chronic illness, migrant workers, and students. Long-term mental health impact was reported in some healthcare workers and epidemic patients, even up to 3 years in the former. Interestingly, when compared to non-quarantined groups, quarantine was not significantly associated with worse mental health outcomes. Conclusion: Important implications for the COVID-19 pandemic were highlighted. Respiratory epidemics pose a significant psychological morbidity onto many population groups. Psychological support for vulnerable groups, including healthcare workers and patients, should be implemented to prevent them from spiraling into clinical psychiatric conditions.
is ?:annotates of	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C0003467> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C0004936> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C0011581> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C0038436> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C0233401> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C1079230> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C1457887> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/rbjfzsm7_hasAnnotation_C1825598>
?:creator	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/Luo%2C_Yang%3B_Chua%2C_Cher_Rui%3B_Xiong%2C_Zhonghui%3B_Ho%2C_Roger_C.%3B_Ho%2C_Cyrus_S._H.>
?:doi	10.3389/fpsyt.2020.565098
?:doi	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.565098>
?:journal	Front_Psychiatry
?:license	cc-by
?:pdf_json_files	document_parses/pdf_json/4884e4bf131cbe826f166cf75bf930e24fa7a639.json
?:pmc_json_files	document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7719673.xml.json
?:pmcid	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/PMC7719673>
?:pmid	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/33329106.0>
?:pmid	33329106.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/COVID-19>
?:sha_id	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/4884e4bf131cbe826f166cf75bf930e24fa7a639>
?:source	Medline; PMC
?:title	A Systematic Review of the Impact of Viral Respiratory Epidemics on Mental Health: An Implication on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic
?:type	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/vocab/Publication>
?:year	2020-11-23

Property

Value

?:abstract

Background: The twenty-first century viral respiratory epidemics have taught us valuable lessons. Our systematic review examined the impact of these epidemics, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), on mental health among different population groups, drawing on their insights for recommendations for the current COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane on April 4, 2020. Studies that had undefined mental health outcomes or did not use a validated scale for measure were excluded. Quality assessment was carried out via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: We included 95 studies, most of which were conducted in Hong Kong (31.6%) and China (21.4%). A total of 30 (30.9%) studies are on the general public, 41 (42.2%) on healthcare workers, and 26 (26.6%) on patients and quarantined individuals. Furthermore, 36 (37.1%) of the studies are of high quality, 48 (49.5%) are of moderate quality, and 13 (13.4%) are of low quality. The most significant mental health outcomes reported include anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. The subgroups identified to have a higher risk of psychiatric symptoms among the general public include females, the elderly, individuals with chronic illness, migrant workers, and students. Long-term mental health impact was reported in some healthcare workers and epidemic patients, even up to 3 years in the former. Interestingly, when compared to non-quarantined groups, quarantine was not significantly associated with worse mental health outcomes. Conclusion: Important implications for the COVID-19 pandemic were highlighted. Respiratory epidemics pose a significant psychological morbidity onto many population groups. Psychological support for vulnerable groups, including healthcare workers and patients, should be implemented to prevent them from spiraling into clinical psychiatric conditions.

is ?:annotates of