ubsy63n

Property	Value
?:abstract	IMPORTANCE: There is limited evidence regarding whether the presence of serum antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a decreased risk of future infection. Understanding susceptibility to infection and the role of immune memory is important for identifying at-risk populations and could have implications for vaccine deployment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate subsequent evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on diagnostic nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among individuals who are antibody-positive compared with those who are antibody-negative, using real-world data. DESIGN: This was an observational descriptive cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study utilized a national sample to create cohorts from a de-identified dataset composed of commercial laboratory test results, open and closed medical and pharmacy claims, electronic health records, hospital billing (chargemaster) data, and payer enrollment files from the United States. Patients were indexed as antibody-positive or antibody-negative according to their first SARS-CoV-2 antibody test recorded in the database. Patients with more than 1 antibody test on the index date where results were discordant were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES/MEASURES: Primary endpoints were index antibody test results and post-index diagnostic NAAT results, with infection defined as a positive diagnostic test post-index, as measured in 30-day intervals (0–30, 31–60, 61–90, >90 days). Additional measures included demographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics at the time of the index antibody test, such as recorded signs and symptoms or prior evidence of COVID-19 (diagnoses or NAAT+) and recorded comorbidities. RESULTS: We included 3,257,478 unique patients with an index antibody test. Of these, 2,876,773 (88.3%) had a negative index antibody result, 378,606 (11.6%) had a positive index antibody result, and 2,099 (0.1%) had an inconclusive index antibody result. Patients with a negative antibody test were somewhat older at index than those with a positive result (mean of 48 versus 44 years). A fraction (18.4%) of individuals who were initially seropositive converted to seronegative over the follow up period. During the follow-up periods, the ratio (CI) of positive NAAT results among individuals who had a positive antibody test at index versus those with a negative antibody test at index was 2.85 (2.73 – 2.97) at 0–30 days, 0.67 (0.6 – 0.74) at 31–60 days, 0.29 (0.24 – 0.35) at 61–90 days), and 0.10 (0.05 – 0.19) at >90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who display positive antibody tests are initially more likely to have a positive NAAT, consistent with prolonged RNA shedding, but over time become markedly less likely to have a positive NAAT. This result suggests seropositivity using commercially available assays is associated with protection from infection. The duration of protection is unknown and may wane over time; this parameter will need to be addressed in a study with extended duration of follow up.
is ?:annotates of	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/0ubsy63n_hasAnnotation_C0035668> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/0ubsy63n_hasAnnotation_C1457887> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/0ubsy63n_hasAnnotation_C5203676>
?:creator	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/Harvey%2C_Raymond_A.%3B_Rassen%2C_Jeremy_A.%3B_Kabelac%2C_Carly_A.%3B_Turenne%2C_Wendy%3B_Leonard%2C_Sandy%3B_Klesh%2C_Reyna%3B_Meyer%2C_William_A.%3B_Kaufman%2C_Harvey_W.%3B_Anderson%2C_Steve%3B_Cohen%2C_Oren%3B_Petkov%2C_Valentina_I.%3B_Cronin%2C_Kathy_A.%3B_Van_Dyke%2C_Alison_L.%3B_Lowy%2C_Douglas_R.%3B_Sharpless%2C_Norman_E.%3B_Penberthy%2C_Lynne_T.>
?:doi	10.1101/2020.12.18.20248336
?:doi	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/10.1101/2020.12.18.20248336>
?:journal	medRxiv
?:license	cc-by-nd
?:pdf_json_files	document_parses/pdf_json/05302a5fa546e7635dfc8327e1f05ae9408e3488.json; document_parses/pdf_json/cbd4be3841d3289df7cc72a09a89b83d491ed501.json
?:pmc_json_files	document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7755144.xml.json
?:pmcid	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/PMC7755144>
?:pmid	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/33354682.0>
?:pmid	33354682.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/COVID-19>
?:sha_id	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/05302a5fa546e7635dfc8327e1f05ae9408e3488%3B%20cbd4be3841d3289df7cc72a09a89b83d491ed501>
?:source	MedRxiv; Medline; PMC; WHO
?:title	Real-world data suggest antibody positivity to SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a decreased risk of future infection
?:type	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/vocab/Publication>
?:year	2020-12-20

Property

Value

?:abstract

IMPORTANCE: There is limited evidence regarding whether the presence of serum antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a decreased risk of future infection. Understanding susceptibility to infection and the role of immune memory is important for identifying at-risk populations and could have implications for vaccine deployment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate subsequent evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on diagnostic nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among individuals who are antibody-positive compared with those who are antibody-negative, using real-world data. DESIGN: This was an observational descriptive cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study utilized a national sample to create cohorts from a de-identified dataset composed of commercial laboratory test results, open and closed medical and pharmacy claims, electronic health records, hospital billing (chargemaster) data, and payer enrollment files from the United States. Patients were indexed as antibody-positive or antibody-negative according to their first SARS-CoV-2 antibody test recorded in the database. Patients with more than 1 antibody test on the index date where results were discordant were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES/MEASURES: Primary endpoints were index antibody test results and post-index diagnostic NAAT results, with infection defined as a positive diagnostic test post-index, as measured in 30-day intervals (0–30, 31–60, 61–90, >90 days). Additional measures included demographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics at the time of the index antibody test, such as recorded signs and symptoms or prior evidence of COVID-19 (diagnoses or NAAT+) and recorded comorbidities. RESULTS: We included 3,257,478 unique patients with an index antibody test. Of these, 2,876,773 (88.3%) had a negative index antibody result, 378,606 (11.6%) had a positive index antibody result, and 2,099 (0.1%) had an inconclusive index antibody result. Patients with a negative antibody test were somewhat older at index than those with a positive result (mean of 48 versus 44 years). A fraction (18.4%) of individuals who were initially seropositive converted to seronegative over the follow up period. During the follow-up periods, the ratio (CI) of positive NAAT results among individuals who had a positive antibody test at index versus those with a negative antibody test at index was 2.85 (2.73 – 2.97) at 0–30 days, 0.67 (0.6 – 0.74) at 31–60 days, 0.29 (0.24 – 0.35) at 61–90 days), and 0.10 (0.05 – 0.19) at >90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who display positive antibody tests are initially more likely to have a positive NAAT, consistent with prolonged RNA shedding, but over time become markedly less likely to have a positive NAAT. This result suggests seropositivity using commercially available assays is associated with protection from infection. The duration of protection is unknown and may wane over time; this parameter will need to be addressed in a study with extended duration of follow up.

is ?:annotates of