PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • OBJECTIVES: To assess the early physiologic response to angiotensin-II treatment in patients with coronavirus disease 2019–induced respiratory failure and distributive shock. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive-sample cohort study. SETTING: Three medical ICUs in New York during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. PATIENTS: All patients were admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure and were receiving norepinephrine for distributive shock. INTERVENTIONS: The treatment groups were patients who received greater than or equal to 1 hour of angiotensin-II treatment. Time-zero was the time of angiotensin-II initiation. Controls were identified using a 2:1 hierarchical process that matched for 1) date and unit of admission; 2) specific organ support modalities; 3) age; 4) chronic lung, cardiovascular, and kidney disease; and 5) sex. Time-zero in the control group was 21 hours post vasopressor initiation, the mean duration of vasopressor therapy prior to angiotensin-II initiation in the treated group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Main outcomes were trajectories of vasopressor requirements (in norepinephrine-equivalent dose) and mean arterial pressure. Additionally assessed trajectories were respiratory (Pao(2)/Fio(2), Paco(2)), metabolic (pH, creatinine), and coagulation (d-dimer) dysfunction indices after time-zero. We also recorded adverse events and clinical outcomes. Trajectories were analyzed using mixed-effects models for immediate (first 6 hr), early (48 hr), and sustained (7 d) responses. Twenty-nine patients (n = 10 treated, n = 19 control) were identified. Despite matching, angiotensin-II–treated patients had markedly greater vasopressor requirements (mean: 0.489 vs 0.097 µg/kg/min), oxygenation impairment, and acidosis at time-zero. Nonetheless, angiotensin-II treatment was associated with an immediate and sustained reduction in norepinephrine-equivalent dose (6 hr model: β = –0.036 µg/kg/min/hr; 95% CI: –0.054 to –0.018 µg/kg/min/hr, p(interaction)=0.0002) (7 d model: β = –0.04 µg/kg/min/d, 95% CI: –0.05 to –0.03 µg/kg/min/d; p(interaction) = 0.0002). Compared with controls, angiotensin-II–treated patients had significantly faster improvement in mean arterial pressure, hypercapnia, acidosis, baseline-corrected creatinine, and d-dimer. Three thrombotic events occurred, all in control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin-II treatment for coronavirus disease 2019–induced distributive shock was associated with rapid improvement in multiple physiologic indices. Angiotensin-II in coronavirus disease 2019–induced shock warrants further study.
is ?:annotates of
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.1097/cce.0000000000000230
?:doi
?:journal
  • Crit_Care_Explor
?:license
  • cc-by-nc-nd
?:pdf_json_files
  • document_parses/pdf_json/0d1ade418c10d64215f5f26b12d4b652a5d79fed.json
?:pmc_json_files
  • document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7523856.xml.json
?:pmcid
?:pmid
?:pmid
  • 33063034.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
is ?:relation_isRelatedTo_publication of
?:sha_id
?:source
  • Medline; PMC
?:title
  • Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
?:type
?:year
  • 2020-09-29

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all