Property | Value |
?:abstract
|
-
OBJECTIVE: No data are available to develop uniform recommendations for reperfusion therapies in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We aimed to fill the evidence gap regarding STEMI reperfusion strategy during the COVID-19 era. METHODS: Clinical characteristics and outcomes for 17 patients with STEMI who received fibrinolysis during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared with 20 patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), and were further compared with another 41 patients who received PPCI in the pre-COVID-19 period. RESULTS: In patients with STEMI, fibrinolysis achieved a comparable in-hospital and 30-day primary composite end point, as compared with those who received PPCI during the COVID-19 pandemic. No major bleeding was detected in either group. Compared patients with STEMI who received PPCI in the pre-COVID-19 period, we found a remarkable extension of chest pain onset-to-first medical contact (FMC) and FMC-to-wire crossing times, significantly increased number and length of stents, and much worse thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow in patients with STEMI who received PPCI during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Owing to its considerable efficacy and safety and advantages in conserving medical resources, we recommend fibrinolysis as a reasonable alternative for STEMI care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
is
?:annotates
of
|
|
?:creator
|
|
?:doi
|
|
?:doi
|
|
?:journal
|
|
?:license
|
|
?:pdf_json_files
|
-
document_parses/pdf_json/f7ae10b2a20060b7eed61e6088bdc5d957392ba3.json
|
?:pmc_json_files
|
-
document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7645389.xml.json
|
?:pmcid
|
|
?:pmid
|
|
?:pmid
|
|
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
|
|
is
?:relation_isRelatedTo_publication
of
|
|
?:sha_id
|
|
?:source
|
|
?:title
|
-
Fibrinolysis is a reasonable alternative for STEMI care during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
?:type
|
|
?:year
|
|