PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Current literature and clinical guidelines do not include pregnant women as an a priori risk group for COVID‐19. However, a gender vision of health begs the question: Why are pregnant women not considered a risk group for COVID‐19? The answer is clear: historically, most community scientific studies have not considered female gender, or pregnancy as a state, to be a focus of special interest or effort. Unfortunately, this bias seems to be maintained in the COVID‐19 epidemic: most current guidelines for diagnosing SARS‐CoV‐2 infection during pregnancy apply the same standard criteria as for the general population.
?:creator
?:doi
?:doi
  • 10.1002/jmv.26350
?:journal
  • J_Med_Virol
?:license
  • no-cc
?:pdf_json_files
  • document_parses/pdf_json/39da8f41df547a6fbab3eae1035dd8a1d70e2969.json
?:pmc_json_files
  • document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7404348.xml.json
?:pmcid
?:pmid
?:pmid
  • 32706391.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:sha_id
?:source
  • Medline; PMC
?:title
  • COVID‐19 and pregnancy: An opportunity to correct an historic gender bias
?:type
?:year
  • 2020-08-02

Metadata

Anon_0  
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#DataItem>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/a1cirnya>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/topic> Anon_0
<http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/informationrealization.owl#realizes> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/data/entity/a1cirnya>
<http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#createdBy>
Anon_1   (more)
expand all