b3wtqlp3

Property	Value
?:abstract	Background: COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare systems and limited access to surgical care. Urolithiasis can lead to emergencies and affect renal function during long-term follow-up. Therefore, timely and appropriate treatment is essential. Main text: This is a non-systematic review of the recently published recommendations regarding urolithiasis treatment options during COVID-19. Fourteen publications were the basis of our review. Regarding anesthesia methods, the optimal methods are still unknown. During COVID-19, most of the endo-urologists changed their routine clinical practice and elective surgical treatment approaches. Despite decreasing number of emergency visits and admissions for stone disease, patients tend to have leukocytosis, higher creatinine levels, increased grade 3 and 4 hydronephrosis, and higher incidence of complications compared to non-COVID-19 time. Several alarming indications if present, intervention should be performed within 24 h to prevent irreversible kidney damage, disease progression, or even death. Some endo-urologists prefer definitive stone treatment over temporarily drainage to reduce the number of emergency room visits and hospital admissions, except if infection is present or staged treatment is planned. Several clinical scenarios of non-emergency and non-urgent urinary stones are present; thus, endo-urologists should appropriately weigh patient\'s risk and surgery benefit to decide to the proper intervention time. If risks outweighed benefits to the patient, postpone the surgery. Renal colic should be managed with medical expulsive therapy and proper pain control with close follow-up just in case it becomes an emergency. Indwelling JJ stent removal or exchange is a matter of debate; some endo-urologists recommend removing, while others recommend postponing. Conclusion: Treatment options for urinary stones have markedly changed during COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal anesthesia methods are still unknown. Emergency intervention is a must if any alarming indications exist. Emergency cases tend to have higher incidence of complications compared to non-COVID-19 time. For non-emergency and non-urgent urolithiasis, endo-urologists should make judicious treatment decision to prioritize urolithiasis treatment, and they should weigh benefits and risks before surgery.
is ?:annotates of	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/b3wtqlp3_hasAnnotation_C0009566> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/b3wtqlp3_hasAnnotation_C0079745> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/b3wtqlp3_hasAnnotation_C0152169> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/b3wtqlp3_hasAnnotation_C0242656> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/b3wtqlp3_hasAnnotation_C1874451> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/b3wtqlp3_hasAnnotation_C3539125>
?:creator	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/Abdel_Raheem%2C_Ali%3B_Alowidah%2C_Ibrahim%3B_Soliman%2C_Mohamed%3B_Haresy%2C_Mefarrih%3B_Almozeni%2C_Ali%3B_Althagafi%2C_Sultan%3B_Almousa%2C_Mohamed%3B_Alturki%2C_Mohamed>
?:journal	Afr_J_Urol
?:license	unk
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/COVID-19>
is ?:relation_isRelatedTo_publication of	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/b3wtqlp3_HAS_C3539125_AFFECTS_C5203670>
?:source	WHO
?:title	Urolithiasis treatment options during COVID-19 pandemic: review of current recommendations and triage systems
?:type	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/vocab/Publication>
?:who_covidence_id	#949125
?:year	2020

Property

Value

?:abstract

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare systems and limited access to surgical care. Urolithiasis can lead to emergencies and affect renal function during long-term follow-up. Therefore, timely and appropriate treatment is essential. Main text: This is a non-systematic review of the recently published recommendations regarding urolithiasis treatment options during COVID-19. Fourteen publications were the basis of our review. Regarding anesthesia methods, the optimal methods are still unknown. During COVID-19, most of the endo-urologists changed their routine clinical practice and elective surgical treatment approaches. Despite decreasing number of emergency visits and admissions for stone disease, patients tend to have leukocytosis, higher creatinine levels, increased grade 3 and 4 hydronephrosis, and higher incidence of complications compared to non-COVID-19 time. Several alarming indications if present, intervention should be performed within 24 h to prevent irreversible kidney damage, disease progression, or even death. Some endo-urologists prefer definitive stone treatment over temporarily drainage to reduce the number of emergency room visits and hospital admissions, except if infection is present or staged treatment is planned. Several clinical scenarios of non-emergency and non-urgent urinary stones are present; thus, endo-urologists should appropriately weigh patient\'s risk and surgery benefit to decide to the proper intervention time. If risks outweighed benefits to the patient, postpone the surgery. Renal colic should be managed with medical expulsive therapy and proper pain control with close follow-up just in case it becomes an emergency. Indwelling JJ stent removal or exchange is a matter of debate; some endo-urologists recommend removing, while others recommend postponing. Conclusion: Treatment options for urinary stones have markedly changed during COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal anesthesia methods are still unknown. Emergency intervention is a must if any alarming indications exist. Emergency cases tend to have higher incidence of complications compared to non-COVID-19 time. For non-emergency and non-urgent urolithiasis, endo-urologists should make judicious treatment decision to prioritize urolithiasis treatment, and they should weigh benefits and risks before surgery.

is ?:annotates of