| Property | Value |
|---|
|
?:abstract
|
-
We read the article entitled \'Second-look endoscopy after POEM for all, some or none: The more you see, the more you find!\'1 , which is a response to our article entitled \'Importance of second-look endoscopy after per-oral endoscopic myotomy for safe postoperative management\'2 . In our retrospective study (n=497), the rate of newly-detected adverse events (nAE) during second-look endoscopy (SE) that required endoscopic intervention or deviation from the normal postoperative course were investigated. nAE were identified in 12 patients; 8 (1.6%) entry site dehiscence; 2 (0.4%) submucosal hemorrhage or hematoma; and 2 (0.4%) dehiscence of an intraoperative perforation site after endoclip closure.
|
|
is
?:annotates
of
|
|
|
?:creator
|
|
|
?:doi
|
|
|
?:doi
|
|
|
?:journal
|
-
Digestive_endoscopy_:_official_journal_of_the_Japan_Gastroenterological_Endoscopy_Society
|
|
?:license
|
|
|
?:pmid
|
|
|
?:pmid
|
|
|
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
|
|
|
?:source
|
|
|
?:title
|
-
What are the factors for detecting adverse events in second-look endoscopy after POEM?: A reply to \'Second-look endoscopy after POEM for all, some or none: The more you see, the more you find!\'
|
|
?:type
|
|
|
?:year
|
|
![[This page as RDF]](https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}