PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • The issue came to a head at the latest council meeting, when a gang of five council members– Jo Dyer, Neil Smith, Danny Chambers, Martin Peaty and Richard Stephenson – pressed for guidance to be amended to state that all remote prescribers should offer back-up care [ ]he said, ‘the last couple of council meetings have been a bit strained’ Chronology 24 March – RCVS Covid-19 taskforce temporarily permits vets to prescribe POM-Vs remotely 25 June – Taskforce extends remote prescribing for the first time 6 August – Taskforce extends remote prescribing for the second time 3 September – Some council members query the taskforce and extensions 21 September – ‘Short notice’ council meeting held in private (see p 291)
?:creator
?:journal
  • The_Veterinary_Record
  • Vet_Rec
?:license
  • unk
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:source
  • WHO
?:title
  • Remote prescribing by vets to continue
?:type
?:who_covidence_id
  • #1024268
  • #879389
?:year
  • 2020

Metadata

Anon_0  
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#DataItem>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/jikk2mby>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/topic> Anon_0
<http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/informationrealization.owl#realizes> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/data/entity/jikk2mby>
<http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#createdBy>
Anon_1   (more)
expand all