kf176k5c

Property	Value
?:abstract	IMPORTANCE: False negative SARS-CoV-2 tests can lead to spread of infection in the inpatient setting to other patients and healthcare workers. However, the population of patients with COVID who are admitted with false negative testing is unstudied. OBJECTIVE: To characterize and develop a model to predict true SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients who initially test negative for COVID by PCR. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Five hospitals within the Yale New Haven Health System between 3/10/2020 and 9/1/2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who received diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 virus within the first 96 hours of hospitalization. EXPOSURE: We developed a logistic regression model from readily available electronic health record data to predict SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients who were positive for COVID and those who were negative and never retested. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: This model was applied to patients testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 who were retested within the first 96 hours of hospitalization. We evaluated the ability of the model to discriminate between patients who would subsequently retest negative and those who would subsequently retest positive. RESULTS: We included 31,459 hospitalized adult patients; 2,666 of these patients tested positive for COVID and 3,511 initially tested negative for COVID and were retested. Of the patients who were retested, 61 (1.7%) had a subsequent positive COVID test. The model showed that higher age, vital sign abnormalities, and lower white blood cell count served as strong predictors for COVID positivity in these patients. The model had moderate performance to predict which patients would retest positive with a test set area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 – 0.83). Using a cutpoint for our risk prediction model at the 90(th) percentile for probability, we were able to capture 35/61 (57%) of the patients who would retest positive. This cutpoint amounts to a number-needed-to-retest range between 15 and 77 patients. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: We show that a pragmatic model can predict which patients should be retested for COVID. Further research is required to determine if this risk model can be applied prospectively in hospitalized patients to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
is ?:annotates of	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/kf176k5c_hasAnnotation_C3541329> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/kf176k5c_hasAnnotation_C5203676>
?:creator	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/Ghazi%2C_Lama%3B_Simonov%2C_Michael%3B_Mansour%2C_Sherry%3B_Moledina%2C_Dennis%3B_Greenberg%2C_Jason%3B_Yamamoto%2C_Yu%3B_Biswas%2C_Aditya%3B_Wilson%2C_F._Perry>
?:doi	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/10.1101/2020.11.30.20241414>
?:doi	10.1101/2020.11.30.20241414
?:journal	medRxiv
?:license	cc-by-nd
?:pdf_json_files	document_parses/pdf_json/2cfcb99d90d43e0d06a2e0f9830f246557f53b13.json; document_parses/pdf_json/64fefec7fce3cfb6e2f8105134cbcaf91ad373e0.json
?:pmc_json_files	document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7724687.xml.json
?:pmcid	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/PMC7724687>
?:pmid	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/33300016.0>
?:pmid	33300016.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/COVID-19>
?:sha_id	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/2cfcb99d90d43e0d06a2e0f9830f246557f53b13%3B%2064fefec7fce3cfb6e2f8105134cbcaf91ad373e0>
?:source	MedRxiv; Medline; PMC; WHO
?:title	Predicting patients with false negative SARS-CoV-2 testing at hospital admission: A retrospective multi-center study
?:type	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/vocab/Publication>
?:year	2020-12-02

Property

Value

?:abstract

IMPORTANCE: False negative SARS-CoV-2 tests can lead to spread of infection in the inpatient setting to other patients and healthcare workers. However, the population of patients with COVID who are admitted with false negative testing is unstudied. OBJECTIVE: To characterize and develop a model to predict true SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients who initially test negative for COVID by PCR. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Five hospitals within the Yale New Haven Health System between 3/10/2020 and 9/1/2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who received diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 virus within the first 96 hours of hospitalization. EXPOSURE: We developed a logistic regression model from readily available electronic health record data to predict SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients who were positive for COVID and those who were negative and never retested. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: This model was applied to patients testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 who were retested within the first 96 hours of hospitalization. We evaluated the ability of the model to discriminate between patients who would subsequently retest negative and those who would subsequently retest positive. RESULTS: We included 31,459 hospitalized adult patients; 2,666 of these patients tested positive for COVID and 3,511 initially tested negative for COVID and were retested. Of the patients who were retested, 61 (1.7%) had a subsequent positive COVID test. The model showed that higher age, vital sign abnormalities, and lower white blood cell count served as strong predictors for COVID positivity in these patients. The model had moderate performance to predict which patients would retest positive with a test set area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 – 0.83). Using a cutpoint for our risk prediction model at the 90(th) percentile for probability, we were able to capture 35/61 (57%) of the patients who would retest positive. This cutpoint amounts to a number-needed-to-retest range between 15 and 77 patients. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: We show that a pragmatic model can predict which patients should be retested for COVID. Further research is required to determine if this risk model can be applied prospectively in hospitalized patients to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

is ?:annotates of