PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Previous meta-analyses were conducted during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, which utilized a smaller pool of data. The current meta-analysis aims to provide additional (and updated) evidence related to the psychological impact among healthcare workers. The search strategy was developed by a medical librarian and bibliographical databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched for studies examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological health of healthcare workers. Articles were screened by three reviewers. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by I(2) statistic. The random-effects model was utilized to obtain the pooled prevalence. A subgroup analysis by region, gender, quality of study, assessment methods, healthcare profession, and exposure was performed. Publication bias was assessed by Funnel plot and Egger linear regression test. Sixty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and the total sample constituted 79,437 participants. The pooled prevalence of anxiety, depression, stress, post-traumatic stress syndrome, insomnia, psychological distress, and burnout was 34.4%, 31.8%, 40.3%, 11.4%, 27.8%, 46.1%, and 37.4% respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated higher anxiety and depression prevalence among females, nurses, and frontline responders than males, doctors, and second-line healthcare workers. This study highlights the need for designing a targeted intervention to improve resilience and foster post-traumatic growth among frontline responders.
is ?:annotates of
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.3390/ijerph17239096
?:doi
?:journal
  • Int_J_Environ_Res_Public_Health
?:license
  • cc-by
?:pdf_json_files
  • document_parses/pdf_json/d7d5a13b65c999a22268ec399fe5df34bac61b05.json
?:pmc_json_files
  • document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7730003.xml.json
?:pmcid
?:pmid
?:pmid
  • 33291511.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:sha_id
?:source
  • Medline; PMC
?:title
  • Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis
?:type
?:year
  • 2020-12-05

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all