PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • BACKGROUND: Several RT-qPCR kits are available for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, some of them with Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by FDA, but most of them lacking of proper evaluation studies due to covid19 emergency. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated Viasure RT-qPCR kit (CerTest Biotec, Spain) for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis using FDA EUA 2019-nCoV CDC kit (IDT, USA) as gold standard. RESULTS: Although we found the lack of RNA quality control probe as the main limitation for the Viasure kit, the sensitivity was 91.9% and the specificity was 100%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 2000 copies/mL and 1000 copies/mL for Viasure and IDT kits, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Viasure RT-qPCR kit is a relatively reliable tool for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis but improvement of an alternative RT-qPCR reaction for RNA extraction quality control as RNaseP is recommended.
is ?:annotates of
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.1016/j.virol.2020.10.010
?:doi
?:journal
  • Virology
?:license
  • no-cc
?:pdf_json_files
  • document_parses/pdf_json/27eda3bba5f1bd268f7145f36dbb7fcdcc68581c.json
?:pmc_json_files
  • document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7673214.xml.json
?:pmcid
?:pmid
?:pmid
  • 33278737.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:sha_id
?:source
  • Elsevier; Medline; PMC
?:title
  • Analytical and clinical comparison of Viasure (CerTest Biotec) and 2019-nCoV CDC (IDT) RT-qPCR kits for SARS-CoV2 diagnosis.
?:type
?:year
  • 2020-11-18

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all