PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • To compare sensitivity of specimens for COVID-19 diagnosis, we tested 151 nasopharyngeal/midturbinate swab pairs from 117 COVID-19 inpatients using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Sensitivity was 94% for nasopharyngeal and 75% for midturbinate swabs (P = .0001). In 88 nasopharyngeal/midturbinate pairs with matched saliva, sensitivity was 86% for nasopharyngeal swabs and 88% for combined midturbinate swabs/saliva.
is ?:annotates of
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.1017/ice.2020.1326
?:doi
?:journal
  • Infection_control_and_hospital_epidemiology
?:license
  • cc-by
?:pdf_json_files
  • document_parses/pdf_json/6941a601b52c1806d326ac03dfd31823a52c1e43.json
?:pmc_json_files
  • document_parses/pmc_json/PMC7750656.xml.json
?:pmcid
?:pmid
?:pmid
  • 33203496.0
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:sha_id
?:source
  • Medline; PMC
?:title
  • Sensitivity of midturbinate versus nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
?:type
?:year
  • 2020-11-18

Metadata

Anon_0  
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#DataItem>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/32903555_HAS_TOPIC_C3854325>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/topic> Anon_0
<http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/informationrealization.owl#realizes> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/data/entity/32903555_HAS_TOPIC_C3854325>
<http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#createdBy>
Anon_1   (more)
expand all