|
?:abstract
|
-
Background: With the global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), chest computed tomography (CT) is vital for diagnosis and follow-up The increasing contribution of CT to the population-collected dose has become a topic of interest Radiation dose optimization for chest CT of COVID-19 patients is of importance in clinical practice The present study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the detection of ground-glass nodules and exudative lesions in chest CT among COVID-19 patients and to find an appropriate combination of imaging parameters that optimize detection while effectively reducing the radiation dose Methods: The anthropomorphic thorax phantom, with 9 spherical nodules of different diameters and CT values of −800, −630, and 100 HU, was used to simulate the lesions of COVID-19 patients Four custom-simulated lesions of porcine fat and ethanol were also scanned at 3 tube potentials (120, 100, and 80 kV) and corresponding milliampere-seconds (mAs) (ranging from 10 to 100) Separate scans were performed at pitches of 0 6, 0 8, 1 0, 1 15, and 1 49, and at collimations of 10, 20, 40, and 80 mm at 80 kV and 100 mAs CT values and standard deviations of simulated nodules and lesions were measured, and radiation dose quantity (volume CT dose index;CTDIvol) was collected Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM) were calculated All images were subjectively evaluated by 2 radiologists to determine whether the nodules were detectable and if the overall image quality met diagnostic requirements Results: All simulated lesions, except −800 HU nodules, were detected at all scanning conditions At a fixed voltage of 120 or 100 kV, with increasing mAs, image noise tended to decrease, and the CNR tended to increase (F=9 694 and P=0 033 for 120 kV;F=9 028 and P=0 034 for 100 kV) The FOM trend was the same as that of CNR (F=2 768 and P=0 174 for 120 kV;F=1 915 and P=0 255 for 100 kV) At 80 kV, the CNRs and FOMs had no significant change with increasing mAs (F=4 522 and P=0 114 for CNRs;F=1 212 and P=0 351 for FOMs) For the 4 nodules of −800 and −630 HU, CNRs had no statistical differences at each of the 5 pitches (F=0 673, P=0 476) The CNRs and FOMs at each of the 4 collimations had no statistical differences (F=2 509 and P=0 125 for CNRs;F=1 485 and P=0 309 for FOMs) for each nodule CNRs and subjective evaluation scores increased with increasing parameter values for each imaging iteration The CNRs of 4 −800 HU nodules in the qualified images at the thresholds of scanning parameters of 120 kV/20 mAs, 100 kV/40 mAs, and 80 kV/80 mAs, had statistical differences (P=0 038), but the FOMs had no statistical differences (P=0 085) Under the 3 threshold conditions, the CNRs and FOMs of the 4 nodules were highest at 100 kV and 40 mAs (1 6 mGy CTDIvol) Conclusions: For chest CT among COVID-19 patients, it is recommended that 100 kV/40 mAs is used for average patients;the radiation dose can be reduced to 1 6 mGy with qualified images to detect ground-glass nodules and exudation lesions
|
![[This page as RDF]](https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}