tla4gzfg

Property	Value
?:abstract	BACKGROUND: Public health measures were instituted to reduce COVID-19 spread A decrease in total emergency department volume followed, but the impact on injury is unknown With lockdown and social distancing potentially increasing domicile discord, we hypothesized that intentional injury increased during COVID-19, driven primarily by an increase in penetrating trauma STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of acute adult patient care in an urban Level I trauma center assessed injury patterns Presenting patient characteristics and diagnoses from 6 weeks pre to 10 weeks post statewide stay-at-home orders (March 16, 2020) were compared, as well as with 2015-2019 Subsets were defined by intentionality (intentional vs nonintentional) and mechanism of injury (blunt vs penetrating) Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare proportions and means RESULTS: There were 357 trauma patients that presented pre stay-at-home order and 480 that presented post stay-at-home order Pre and post groups demonstrated differences in sex (35 6% vs 27 9% female;p = 0 02), age (47 4 +/- 22 1 years vs 42 +/- 20 3 years;p = 0 009), and race (1 4% vs 2 3% Asian;63 3% vs 68 3% Black;30 5% vs 22 3% White;and 4 8% vs 7 1% other;p = 0 03) Post stay-at-home order mechanism of injury revealed more intentional injury (p = 0 0008) Decreases in nonintentional trauma after adoption of social isolation paralleled declines in daily emergency department visits Compared with earlier years, 2020 demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of intentional violent injury during the peripandemic months, especially from firearms CONCLUSIONS: Unprecedented social isolation policies to address COVID-19 were associated with increased intentional injury, especially gun violence Meanwhile, emergency department and nonintentional trauma visits decreased Pandemic-related public health measures should embrace intentional injury prevention and management strategies BACKGROUND: Public health measures were instituted to reduce COVID-19 spread. A decrease in total emergency department volume followed, but the impact on injury is unknown. With lockdown and social distancing potentially increasing domicile discord, we hypothesized that intentional injury increased during COVID-19, driven primarily by an increase in penetrating trauma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of acute adult patient care in an urban Level I trauma center assessed injury patterns. Presenting patient characteristics and diagnoses from 6 weeks pre to 10 weeks post statewide stay-at-home orders (March 16, 2020) were compared, as well as with 2015-2019. Subsets were defined by intentionality (intentional vs nonintentional) and mechanism of injury (blunt vs penetrating). Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare proportions and means. RESULTS: There were 357 trauma patients that presented pre stay-at-home order and 480 that presented post stay-at-home order. Pre and post groups demonstrated differences in sex (35.6% vs 27.9% female; p = 0.02), age (47.4 ± 22.1 years vs 42 ± 20.3 years; p = 0.009), and race (1.4% vs 2.3% Asian; 63.3% vs 68.3% Black; 30.5% vs 22.3% White; and 4.8% vs 7.1% other; p = 0.03). Post stay-at-home order mechanism of injury revealed more intentional injury (p = 0.0008). Decreases in nonintentional trauma after adoption of social isolation paralleled declines in daily emergency department visits. Compared with earlier years, 2020 demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of intentional violent injury during the peripandemic months, especially from firearms. CONCLUSIONS: Unprecedented social isolation policies to address COVID-19 were associated with increased intentional injury, especially gun violence. Meanwhile, emergency department and nonintentional trauma visits decreased. Pandemic-related public health measures should embrace intentional injury prevention and management strategies.
is ?:annotates of	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C0043251> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C0043254> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C0151737> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C0242151> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C0740686> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C1825598> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C3639957> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_hasAnnotation_C4763741>
?:creator	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/Abdallah%2C_H._O.%3B_Zhao%2C_C.%3B_Kaufman%2C_E.%3B_Hatchimonji%2C_J.%3B_Swendiman%2C_R._A.%3B_Kaplan%2C_L._J.%3B_Seamon%2C_M.%3B_Schwab%2C_C._W.%3B_Pascual%2C_J._L.> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/Abdallah%2C_Hatem_O%3B_Zhao%2C_Cindy%3B_Kaufman%2C_Elinore%3B_Hatchimonji%2C_Justin%3B_Swendiman%2C_Robert_A%3B_Kaplan%2C_Lewis_J%3B_Seamon%2C_Mark%3B_Schwab%2C_C_William%3B_Pascual%2C_Jose_L>
?:journal	J_Am_Coll_Surg Journal_of_the_American_College_of_Surgeons
?:license	unk
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/COVID-19>
is ?:relation_isRelatedTo_publication of	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_HAS_C0151737_COEXISTS_WITH_C5203670> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_HAS_C1825598_AUGMENTS_C5203670> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/tla4gzfg_HAS_C4763741_COEXISTS_WITH_C5203670>
?:source	WHO
?:title	Increased Firearm Injury During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Hidden Urban Burden
?:type	<https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/vocab/Publication>
?:who_covidence_id	#1065267 #912329
?:year	2021

Property

Value

?:abstract

BACKGROUND: Public health measures were instituted to reduce COVID-19 spread A decrease in total emergency department volume followed, but the impact on injury is unknown With lockdown and social distancing potentially increasing domicile discord, we hypothesized that intentional injury increased during COVID-19, driven primarily by an increase in penetrating trauma STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of acute adult patient care in an urban Level I trauma center assessed injury patterns Presenting patient characteristics and diagnoses from 6 weeks pre to 10 weeks post statewide stay-at-home orders (March 16, 2020) were compared, as well as with 2015-2019 Subsets were defined by intentionality (intentional vs nonintentional) and mechanism of injury (blunt vs penetrating) Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare proportions and means RESULTS: There were 357 trauma patients that presented pre stay-at-home order and 480 that presented post stay-at-home order Pre and post groups demonstrated differences in sex (35 6% vs 27 9% female;p = 0 02), age (47 4 +/- 22 1 years vs 42 +/- 20 3 years;p = 0 009), and race (1 4% vs 2 3% Asian;63 3% vs 68 3% Black;30 5% vs 22 3% White;and 4 8% vs 7 1% other;p = 0 03) Post stay-at-home order mechanism of injury revealed more intentional injury (p = 0 0008) Decreases in nonintentional trauma after adoption of social isolation paralleled declines in daily emergency department visits Compared with earlier years, 2020 demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of intentional violent injury during the peripandemic months, especially from firearms CONCLUSIONS: Unprecedented social isolation policies to address COVID-19 were associated with increased intentional injury, especially gun violence Meanwhile, emergency department and nonintentional trauma visits decreased Pandemic-related public health measures should embrace intentional injury prevention and management strategies
BACKGROUND: Public health measures were instituted to reduce COVID-19 spread. A decrease in total emergency department volume followed, but the impact on injury is unknown. With lockdown and social distancing potentially increasing domicile discord, we hypothesized that intentional injury increased during COVID-19, driven primarily by an increase in penetrating trauma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of acute adult patient care in an urban Level I trauma center assessed injury patterns. Presenting patient characteristics and diagnoses from 6 weeks pre to 10 weeks post statewide stay-at-home orders (March 16, 2020) were compared, as well as with 2015-2019. Subsets were defined by intentionality (intentional vs nonintentional) and mechanism of injury (blunt vs penetrating). Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare proportions and means. RESULTS: There were 357 trauma patients that presented pre stay-at-home order and 480 that presented post stay-at-home order. Pre and post groups demonstrated differences in sex (35.6% vs 27.9% female; p = 0.02), age (47.4 ± 22.1 years vs 42 ± 20.3 years; p = 0.009), and race (1.4% vs 2.3% Asian; 63.3% vs 68.3% Black; 30.5% vs 22.3% White; and 4.8% vs 7.1% other; p = 0.03). Post stay-at-home order mechanism of injury revealed more intentional injury (p = 0.0008). Decreases in nonintentional trauma after adoption of social isolation paralleled declines in daily emergency department visits. Compared with earlier years, 2020 demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of intentional violent injury during the peripandemic months, especially from firearms. CONCLUSIONS: Unprecedented social isolation policies to address COVID-19 were associated with increased intentional injury, especially gun violence. Meanwhile, emergency department and nonintentional trauma visits decreased. Pandemic-related public health measures should embrace intentional injury prevention and management strategies.

is ?:annotates of