Property | Value |
?:abstract
|
-
Non-utilisation of organs from consented deceased donors remains a significant factor in limiting patient access to transplantation. Critical to reducing waste is a clear understanding of why organs are not used: accurate metrics are essential to identify the extent and causes of waste but use of these measures as targets or comparators between units/jurisdictions must be done with caution as focus on any one measure may result in unintended adverse consequences. Comparison between centres or countries may be misleading because of variation in definitions, patient or graft characteristics. Two of the most challenging areas to improve appropriate deceased donor organ utilisation are appetite for risk and lack of validated tools to help identify an organ that will function appropriately. Currently the implanting surgeon is widely considered to be accountable for the use of a donated organ so guidelines must be clear to allow and support sensible decisions and recognition that graft failure or inadvertent disease transmission are not necessarily attributable to poor decision-making. Accepting an organ involves balancing risk and benefit for the potential recipient. Novel technologies such as machine perfusion may allow for more robust guidance as to the functioning of the organ.
|
is
?:annotates
of
|
|
?:creator
|
|
?:doi
|
|
?:doi
|
|
?:journal
|
-
Transplant_international_:_official_journal_of_the_European_Society_for_Organ_Transplantation
|
?:license
|
|
?:pmid
|
|
?:pmid
|
|
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
|
|
?:source
|
|
?:title
|
-
Organ utilisation -the next hurdle in transplantation?
|
?:type
|
|
?:year
|
|