PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate the use of community visioning in Montgomery, Alabama and Chattanooga, Tennessee, as each municipality seeks to become a globally competitive 21st century smart city while also fostering participatory and inclusive planning processes Design/methodology/approach: This research is qualitative, drawing upon discourse analysis of relevant mass media and public documents to map the consultation process and identify the key themes and challenges arising in the two visioning projects Findings: Montgomery and Chattanooga are committed to using participatory visioning to generate inclusive pathways to smart city status by 2040 Each used the local utility company as the key platform to enable a smart city because of each company’s inclusive demographic reach and historical status The two cities are at different stages of the smart city trajectory and each faces ongoing challenges in ensuring that the benefits of smart city development reach beyond elites to include communities across racial and economic lines To date, the planning process in each city is more accurately classified as a responsive community visioning rather than participatory Research limitations/implications: This is a pilot assessment of community visioning in Montgomery and Chattanooga Implementation of each vision is ongoing and further research is needed to illuminate how each city meets ongoing challenges and opportunities, particularly in light of the Covid-19 pandemic and its flow-on economic and social shocks Originality/value: The value of this work lies in the comparison of community visioning across two mid-sized and diverse American cities in the Southern region that must compete with larger and more established technology-hubs in both the USA and globally for investment, amenities and human capital © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited
is ?:annotates of
?:creator
?:journal
  • Foresight
?:license
  • unk
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:source
  • WHO
?:title
  • Smart city visions: pathways to participatory planning in two American cities
?:type
?:who_covidence_id
  • #891445
?:year
  • 2020

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all