|
?:abstract
|
-
Except for such rare situations where it might be determined absence of physician\'s imputability, physicians cannot \'save the most lives while respecting the legal rights of the patient\' without violating the overarching principle \'every human life has equal value\' Arguing to the contrary is a conscious hypocritical attitude, or in other words, a fiction Medical law and ethics long since carry with its various fictions Furthermore, in a public health emergency such as the current COVID -19 crisis, medical law and ethics change and shift the focus from the patient-centered model towards the public health-centered model Under these particular circumstances, this fiction becomes striking, and it can no longer be swept under the rug As health emergencies can happen anywhere, anytime, the patient prioritization in circumstances of limited resources should be accepted Medical law and ethics should back away from strict commitment to placing paramount emphasis on the value of human life It is time for medic al law and ethics to leave taboo-related hypocritical attitudes, and venture to make a historic compromise To do so, three principles should be met: subsidiarity, proportionality, and consensus and social proof
|
![[This page as RDF]](https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}