PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • This paper2 provides an overview of current responses to fake news and digital disinformation inside and outside the EU, and assesses the advantages and disadvantages of each solution Four approaches emerge: (1) self-regulation (i e actions undertaken on a voluntary basis by the digital platforms);(2) co-regulation (i e cooperation framework between EU-level and national-level authorities, the internet platform companies, media organizations, researchers, and other stakeholders);(3) direct regulation (i e legal measures & sanctions);and (4) audience-centred solutions (i e fact-checking and media literacy) We argue in favour of the co-regulation approach, while drawing attention to some current challenges in the response against disinformation Furthermore, we need to go beyond the understanding ofdisinformation as an information/ truth fraud, and draw additional measures to reflect the particular understanding of disinformation as a form of users engagement fraud
is ?:annotates of
?:creator
?:journal
  • Romanian_Journal_of_European_Affairs
?:license
  • unk
?:publication_isRelatedTo_Disease
?:source
  • WHO
?:title
  • Tackling Disinformation: EU Regulation of the Digital Space
?:type
?:who_covidence_id
  • #824596
?:year
  • 2020

Metadata

Anon_0  
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#DataItem>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/entity/z3n8rq86>
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/topic> Anon_0
<http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/informationrealization.owl#realizes> <https://research.tib.eu/covid-19/data/entity/z3n8rq86>
<http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns#createdBy>
Anon_1   (more)
expand all